Question:
What's the difference between Classical and Baroque music?
Bartholomew
2013-06-03 20:59:36 UTC
This is all i noticed:

*They have different eras
*Baroque music uses a Harpsichord instead of Piano
*Is it me or just the Baroque violin sounds different from Classical??

Please tell more.. This is not a homework i swear to God.. i just want to know more
Six answers:
thecanadianone
2013-06-03 22:12:54 UTC
There are a LOT of differences between the music of these two "periods" in music. Classical music is simpler, more melodic, less "contrapuntal" (not as much imitation between the parts), and more meant to be "entertaining" in a gentle, non-challenging way. Baroque music is more intellectually challenging, more complex, much more contrapuntal, and has much more musical "architecture" in terms of harmonic progressions, fugues and other interesting and wonderful musical structures. The instrumentation is also different: almost all the musical instruments changed considerably in the years at the end of the Baroque and the beginning of the Classical periods... one of the major driving forces of this, was larger concert halls and the decline of "chamber" music where the instruments could be soft and still be heard clearly. The harpsichord to piano transition is a good example: pianos can be heard much better in large spaces than harpsichords can. Bach and Handel are the two best known composers of the Baroque era, while Mozart and Haydn ruled the Classical period. Bach and Mozart are two of like, the TOP composers ever.....



Baroque music used more "ornaments" and added trills and such - although this was usually not written down, but instead left to the individual performer to make up on the spot, or plan out ahead of time what the would do. Classical music is simpler, and there is much less room for improvisation or additions to the music by the performer: almost everything is written down.



The best way to get to know the differences and to appreciate the unique qualities of each period, is simply to listen to lots more music from each one!! Mozart and Bach are the top composers of course but especially in the Baroque period there are many others very much worth listening to, such as Telemann, Vivaldi, Handel, Pachelbel (of the famous "Canon in D") and for the early part of the Baroque, Purcell.
anonymous
2016-03-11 04:23:58 UTC
This is a huge question, but the most obvious difference, is that Baroque music had a much larger emphasis on counterpoint. As for why? People are always trying to do things better than the other guy, or the last generation. I don't think anyone necessarily saw a need, it's just that styles change. Actually, we're lucky that a couple guys had the foresight to resurrect Bach, because his music was out of style by the time Beethoven came around. It was Mendohlsson who brought Bach's music back around, and if he didn't it's likely we would not be listening to Baroque music today.
del_icious_manager
2013-06-04 02:04:13 UTC
Two really long answers which, in all likelihood, have not helped at all. That's because you cannot describe in words the differences between musical styles in a way that will transfer anything useful to your "mind's ear". The only way to appreciate the differences is to LISTEN to lots of examples. Soon you will be able to hear how one differs from the other (yes, Baroque DOES sound different to Classical).
anonymous
2013-06-03 22:34:20 UTC
It's not quite as black-and-white as many people imagine. many ideals of the classical era were beginning to materialize during the last half of the baroque era, and it was a slower transition than it is often made out to be. there are several main factors which caused the stylistic shift. they are not limited to, but most certainly include:



Instrument development - as you've noticed, there were big changes going on in instrument technology during the time. The piano, though already invented by the end of the baroque period, was undergoing practical development in order to become a more functional instrument. Part of that includes action mechanisms capable of more virtuosic playing, and structural developments to allow it to be more capable of higher string tension resulting in higher potential volume output so that it could stand up to the forces of larger orchestras. The violin was also undergoing changes, namely development in bow structure and lengthening of the neck/fingerboard, in order to accommodate higher tension and higher volume output, resulting in a stronger, more brilliant tone. The classical period is also marked by the invention of the clarinet, which was developed from the concept of the chalumeau of the baroque era. These are not the only instrument developments which were going on at the time, but they're arguably the most notable.



The Age of Enlightenment - During this era (end of Baroque through the Classical era), there was a large shift in the social classes, resulting in a massively increased middle class. As a direct result of this, the audience of music shifted from predominantly royalty to both royalty and common citizens. This explains many aspects of the music of the time - the focus on complex counterpoint was shifted to a focus on "melody with accompaniment", catchy tunes, simple harmonic progressions, and impressive virtuosity on the part of the performer rather than on carefully executed contrapuntal integrity - things the general public could grasp and appreciate. The Age of Enlightenment was also marked by an idealization of classic Greek art, architecture, and culture. The operatic scene of the time witnessed an increase in the prominence of the "opera seria", or serious opera concerned with themes of Greek mythology, and focused on characters' moral development, rather than more comedic themes. Also adopted from the Greek culture was the idea of the Greek tradition of orally presented drama, spoken or sung by a single person, accompanied by a lyre or another such instrument. This is another factor in the development of the "melody with accompaniment" aspect of Classical music, originally a feature of later Baroque opera, and then subsequently adopted in the realm of chamber music.



Obviously, there were more factors than just two at play in the transition from Baroque to Classical, but those are (I think) the ones which affected music the greatest. But yes, you are right on track with what you said, and I would add to the list more emphasis on virtuosity, simpler harmonic progressions, more emphasis on a clear and catchy melodic line than all other voices, the development of sonata-allegro form, and larger audiences, resulting in a need for greater dynamic force in instruments.
Joel
2013-06-04 19:57:29 UTC
I think the most simple way to put it is that baroque uses polyrhythms and classical uses chords. There are more differences, but thats the most basic way I can put it. Also, baroque uses no vibrato.
MSB94
2013-06-03 21:13:57 UTC
Classical music refers to music written during the classical period, baroque music refers to music written during the baroque period. Classical is a much too broadly used term. Contrary to popular belief, Bach's music is not classical, but baroque.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...